Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:41
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Carlie Irsay-Gordon explains her habit of wearing a headset during games - NBC Sports
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Why did the American's mulberry harbor not hold up after D-Day?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
FBI Warning Issued As 2FA Bypass Attacks Surge — Get Prepared - Forbes
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Do most narcissists have good intentions as long as you are under their control?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Don't you think Democrats are so full of it stool softener and an enema couldn't help them?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
The doctor said 'be happy.' Music therapy can help cancer patients do that - NPR
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why do Indian guys love Russian girls?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: